onfocus

Pointy Birds

Pointy birds,
oh pointy pointy.
Anoint my head
anointy 'nointy.

- Steve Martin

Check out Ticketstubs.org which launched today. skp really likes Matt's Engagement at Mt. Tam.

Happy New Year! I'm going to be launching a fun project in the new year called BlogFodder. It will be a daily email with an idea, phrase, poem, image, or question that could spark a weblog post. If you have a weblog and you have difficulty coming up with post ideas, BlogFodder is for you. If you just want to receive something different in your inbox, this could be for you too. Hopefully it will evolve as the year progresses, and your feedback and suggestions will help shape what it becomes.

I don't have the website or mailing list ready to go yet, but I'd like to start tomorrow so I can get in an email each day for 2003. If you'd like to sign up, go here and enter your email address. If you sign up now, there will still be a list signup process down the road when the site/list is officially ready to go. I'll announce it here when it's all set up. Thanks for checking it out—and I hope the daily BlogFodder will be an interesting new way to think about posts on your weblog.

I ran into Ev on a flight from Denver to Sacramento. On that flight I read the article in Fast Company that he discusses today. It's called What Should I Do With My Life? I recommend it.

The Bay Area is rainy. I hope it gets better before our trip back to Oregon. I'd hate to repeat the blizzard traveling we had to go through to get down here.

An application similar to BookPost: MTAmazon. [via BlogPopuli]

Hope you're having a good holiday. I'm in Nebraska spending time with family (and spending it away from the Web). The trip here involved a 24 hour wait/drive through a blizzard in the Cascades. And a mad sprint through the Denver airport to make our connecting flight to Omaha. We survived, our luggage made it, we caught up on sleep and we're relaxing now. The best part is, I now know how to put chains on my tires. You learn something new every time you travel.

A house just isn't a home until the all-seeing TiVo eye is blinking with life.

Wondering what to get that politically active Lord of the Rings fan on your Christmas list? It's because you haven't seen the Bush is Sauran (save the Shire!) T-shirt yet. (You can order those shirts—and lots of other similarly-themed stickers, pins, and T-shirts here.)

Rafe Colburn posted some good thoughts about career planning for programmers (like me), and whether to go broad or deep with your skillset. He says, "Aside from my specific knowledge of HTML, Perl, Java, SQL and other things like that, I have general knowledge of what makes sense for developing applications, how to get projects finished on time, and how to evaluate and make decisions on technology." For many jobs I've applied for, these general knowledge skills like application design and user experience design rarely come up. In fact, I've often had to fill out a grid of numbers: years of experience with given technologies. I imagine they take these grids and input them into a computer, calculating scores for all applicants. I know it's not that cut and dried in reality, but when programmers are hiring programmers it makes sense that they'd come up with an algorithm so they don't personally have to focus on the task. I wonder if there's a way to hack this standard hiring algorithm, and which method (breadth or depth) works best for scoring.

I'm at a similar decision point. I've always worked with Microsoft technologies: SQL Server, Visual Basic, IIS, ASP. Do I dive completely into .NET? Or do I widen my non-general skillset to include more open source technologies? Based on my experience with applying for jobs, I should stick with Microsoft so the numbers on my application can keep climbing. That's frustrating.

Ben (on Six Apart's swanky new Six Log), discusses extending PGP-signing with a centralized verification/web of trust service. I agree that would be fantastic. But I don't think it needs to exist before implementing PGP-signing in open systems. Signing and verifying can already be done with desktop tools. If PGP-signing catches on, tools to make the process easier would be a void that someone could fill with a centralized Web application. It seems natural.

I think part of what makes this PGP-signing approach nice though, is that it doesn't rely on any one central service. It makes identity management completely decentralized.